RE: Snaps Container // 6/20/2026, 7:24:00 PM

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Snaps Container // 6/20/2026, 7:24:00 PM

View the full context

forkyishere in Snaps • 28 days ago

Commentary based on highlights only.

Mexico vs Korea - So much bad luck for the Koreans, and SOOO much luck for Mexico. That free goal was demoralising. Great kick that could have been a goal for Mexico, and very very lucky save by the end.

USA vs Australia - That 2nd goal was pure luck of not being an offside.

Scotland vs Marocco - What a goal from Marocco! They deserve the win in my view. Played well.

Brazil vs Haiti - Even with so many mistakes, Brazil still destroyed Haiti.

Türkiye vs Paraguay - Fastest goal of the tournament! That was really quick! The red card could have been avoided... quite stupid. Still Paraguay, still won with less one and some extra luck.

Netherlands vs Sweden - Sweden attacked too late in the game, so the pressure from Netherlands made it impossible for them to recover.

Germany vs Côte d'Ivoire - They were in very deep 💩, but managed to counterbalance. It was close Germany.

Ecuador v Curaçao - Must have been an extremely fun game to watch. Both teams giving a hell of a show.

28 days ago in Snaps by forkyishere

0.00 FOODIE

Sort:

Trending

[-]

rimurutempest 26 days ago

That's a very infomative recap of worldcup!

0.00 FOODIE

3 votes

[-]

forkyishere 26 days ago

Meant to be quick and easy to catch up, but I always enjoy seeing the highlights. But because I don't have time for everything, I though, maybe someone will appreciate a quick simple catch up.

0.00 FOODIE

1 vote

[-]

erikah 27 days ago

How come you can write such a long Snap? 😦

0.00 FOODIE

15 votes

[-]

forkyishere 27 days ago

Give me a break! I only do it... sometimes! Anyone can do it... Please don't!

0.00 FOODIE

3 votes

[-]

erikah 27 days ago

Ooops, looks like my comment offended you.

What I meant by it is, how you do it technically, because when I write a snap, it limits content to a third of what you posted here and can't post my snap, unless the extra content is removed.

This is why my question.

0.00 FOODIE

14 votes

[-]

forkyishere 27 days ago

Not at all, sorry if that looked like a reply like that. I was more or less writing like in a sarcastic way :D but at the same time denying the fact I know how to do it... and many others might not :D No worries at all.

The "please don't" is like a second voice person of myself tell my me self to not acknowledge that "anyone can do it" LOL

And the answer is, you can do it by going to the main post, thread or viewing the comment as a normal post, which does not disables the character limit.

Either way, hopefully this clarifies that the limit is not a chain limit... its just a UI thing :D - that was implemented I believe to convey shorter ways of communication and avoid long comments like this one :D LOL

0.00 FOODIE

[-]

erikah 26 days ago

Ah, I thought you got mad at me 😬

And the answer is, you can do it by going to the main post, thread or viewing the comment as a normal post, which does not disables the character limit.

This is the answer to my question, really helpful as I didn't know this. So thank you! 😉

0.00 FOODIE

14 votes

[-]

forkyishere 25 days ago

I forget text communication does not have embedded telepathy features out of the box. Requires some sort of encrypted personal touch, but that is dependent on previous personal face to face experiences. 🤣