You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Ecency Leaderboard Champions!

in Ecency โ€ข last year

Maybe putting "LOLZ burner raffle bot" and "LOLZ tipping bot" on the same comment significantly added to the confusion. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜…

!PIZZA

Sort: ย 

Well, yes, that didn't help, but also using the term 'burn' in two seemingly contradictory ways was what caused the brain cells to start spinning...lol! ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’š โœจ ๐Ÿค™

!PIZZA

Maybe the statement that says that "!LOLZ command not successful is LOLZ token burned" was the most confusing part. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜…

!LOLZ !HUG

Exactly, that's the phrase that did it! ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’š โœจ ๐Ÿค™

!LOLZ
!HUG

I think that we should consider a token burned only if it is sent to the @null account. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค“

!LUV

Yep, exactly! That's the definition that I use. ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’š โœจ ๐Ÿค™

!LUV

Looks like basically all of the confusion on my older comment is when I said "burning tokens" where the tokens are not sent to null. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜…

!PIZZA !LUV

ย last yearย (edited)

Your assessment is correct! You got it! ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’š โœจ ๐Ÿค™

LUV
PIZZA

Do you mean "your" instead of you're? ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿค“

Anyway, maybe the LOLZ burner bot needs a change of name because of the definition of token burning! ๐Ÿ˜…

!LUV
!PIZZA

Dear @savvytester, you just got hugged.
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @tydynrain.
(2/3)

Dear @tydynrain, you just got hugged.
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @savvytester.
(2/3)