Maybe the statement that says that "!LOLZ command not successful is LOLZ token burned" was the most confusing part. ๐ค๐
!LOLZ !HUG
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: ย Trending
Exactly, that's the phrase that did it! ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!LOLZ
!HUG
I think that we should consider a token burned only if it is sent to the @null account. ๐ค๐ค
!LUV
Yep, exactly! That's the definition that I use. ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!LUV
Looks like basically all of the confusion on my older comment is when I said "burning tokens" where the tokens are not sent to null. ๐ค๐
!PIZZA !LUV
Your assessment is correct! You got it! ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
LUV
PIZZA
Do you mean "your" instead of you're? ๐ค๐๐ค
Anyway, maybe the LOLZ burner bot needs a change of name because of the definition of token burning! ๐
!LUV
!PIZZA
Hehe...yes, that was a typo. It's been corrected.
That might be helpful, though a new bot would have to be created, since names can't be changed. ๐๐๐โจ๐ค
!LUV
!PIZZA
Looks like correcting you're to "your" also removes the exclamation marks before the !LUV and !PIZZA tipping bot commands! ๐๐
I don't think that bots would have any significant problem in case a new Hive account (which will have a different name) is created for them, since all parts of the code containing the old username and private keys should simply be replaced with the new ones. ๐ค๐ค๐
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @tydynrain.
(2/3)
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @savvytester.
(2/3)