Emotionally Unsatisfied

in Reflections7 months ago

While only about halfway through the podcast whilst at the gym, something was said that resonated with me and caused me to reflect a little. The podcast is The Drive by Peter Attia and this one was on obesity. I listen elsewhere, but I think those interested can listen directly from that link. There is a lot covered in there, but two things stood out to me because of my own interests and writings over the years.

image.png

As some know, I am often writing about the growing prevalence of obesity in our communities, but I also use it as an example for lots of different situations, because it is something that most of us can relate to. If we aren't struggling with it directly ourselves, we likely know of people in our close circles that are.

I don't write about it to make others feel bad, I write about it because I am someone who struggles with my own health and physical condition. While it should be pretty easy to manage weight, fat and health by eating correctly and exercising enough, these things are made more difficult because they are affected by our upbringing, our habits, our lack of understanding and of course, our emotional states.

As I have had a recent discussion about emotional management here, my brain focused in on a couple of things that were mentioned in the podcast. The first is the environmental factors, which is essentially the ecosystem we have created around food and movement, which has changed the way we eat and move. The other is about the emotional side of it, and something in particular - satisfaction. It is this last one I am going to consider here, but I think it is also worth starting with the environment, because -

We are what we eat.

And what we eat is going to be heavily influenced by what we surround ourselves with, and we have surrounded ourselves with a lot of easy to get, attractive foods that might not be the best for us. Not only this, it is combined with advertising and social supports that make it even more compelling. We have a far richer selection than we did even a few decades ago, and it is nearly always available. There is a lot to think about in terms of what is available and when, as well as what we get out of consuming what we do and why.

Yet, what caught my attention was something more philosophical than the environment, but likely still related, as we have also changed the way we think and feel about what we consume. Food is no longer just a survival need, it is would into our social lives, our culture and even our identity. It isn't a simple tool to keep us alive, we now also need to be satisfied by what we eat.

The question raised in the podcast was if there is a right way to eat, does that mean that we can still be satisfied? And this resonates with me, because it is something that I have noticed in myself and others, where there is some kind of expectation that I should be able to eat healthily and feel good about it, which leads me down the path of looking for alternatives.

For instance, my wife and daughter have gluten intolerance, yet my wife looks for all kinds of alternatives so she can keep eating bread. And, the market is filled (in Finland) with gluten-free options. This is an example of looking for an alternative so as to feel satisfied, rather than going without in order to be healthy. And of course, my wife is not alone, because I will do the same thing with sweet foods to satisfy my sweet teeth, constantly looking for something that I can get the taste on my tongue, without it affecting my health.

It might be impossible.

Again, I am not alone and because the demand is so high, industry has created a lot of sugar substitutes, like aspartame, which deliver the sweetness of sugar, as well as increases the risk of cancers. And, we create these substitutes in order to feel satisfied, to meet our desires, to fill that void. But, maybe that void shouldn't be filled and perhaps it is healthy to live unsatisfied to some degree, a little hungry, and learn to go without.

But, the environment we have built through the media has made us feel that if we have a desire, we should fill it, no matter what it really is. And now, we live in a world where everything is available on-demand, whenever or wherever we happen to be. This is something else I have a history of writing about as a negative, because it impacts on the way we think, feel and behave and I believe it is responsible for a lot of the sense of entitlement we see in younger generations, where they feel that they deserve to get whatever they want, whenever they want, even if it harms others to fulfill their desires.

I have often talked about patience also, but patience isn't just about the ability of being able to wait for a result, it is also about being uncomfortable before the result arrives. Patience is being able to put up with being unsatisfied, in the hope that it will lead to future satisfaction. It is an investment, with the cost being not having what is wanted now.

And, while this post talks about obesity, it really is about our emotional states and our behaviors, where we have created an environment where we are controlled by how we feel, and have the ability to satisfy ourselves, even if it is not in our best interest to do so. We do this with food, we do this with entertainment, we do this with our relationships. We keep looking for ways to satisfy ourselves, even while it harms us.

Do the right thing.

The thing about "the right thing" is that even if I knew exactly what I needed to do to be healthy, it is unlikely I would do it. It is the same for the people who constantly scroll Instagram, knowing it isn't bringing them the value their time is worth, but they keep justifying it. It isn't that we don't have the information to improve our personal lives across to a large degree, but we don't have the emotional intelligence to be willing to do what it takes to improve.

We keep looking for a substitute to satisfy us, when what we might need to do, is learn to live with more dissatisfaction.

Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]

Sort:  

I think a lot of the newer weight loss systems are starting to bring the mental component into the picture more. This way people aren't spending as much time worry about what they are eating, but they are thinking more about why they are eating. So I have heard anyway.

I think there are a few changes coming. My "fear" is that rather than getting to the causes, it will all be pushed to pharmaceutical controls.

Yeah, I hear there. My good friend is dealing with gastroperesis from those new diabetic meds. He has the kid you are born with so he needs to control it, but he has now lost over 50% of his guts from it.

As someone who has had chronic stomach issues for 30 years, I feel for your friend. Stomach issues are debilitating.

To some degree, I would say we might be able to blame a system that ran out of ways to sell us more food, and so it instead switched to selling us convenience.

These days, fewer and fewer people actually prepare their own food — particularly among younger generations. Not only are people busy getting DoorDash and Uber Eats from places where somebody else prepared the food (in god knows what manner), often these services are used to deliver fast food.

The interesting thing about "handmade" food cooked from fresh ingredients — especially if those fresh ingredients are locally sourced in your garden or from local farmers markets — is that you actually end up eating less because it's real food you get the nutrition from, but not only additives and fillers.

I'm not sure how much you experience that in Finland where the food perhaps comes from closer to the producers, but here in the USA people have gotten very far removed from where the food actually comes from.

Meanwhile, we sit still in front of our screens instead of spending a little time and energy actually growing fresh food in our own gardens. Which becomes a "loop" of sort, because something you created yourself IS more satisfying. A carrot from the garden somehow tastes better than one from a supermarket freezer... and, a sort of emotional regulation happens.

=^..^=

To some degree, I would say we might be able to blame a system that ran out of ways to sell us more food, and so it instead switched to selling us convenience.

And now they can create drugs so that we can eat more food again! :D

from places where somebody else prepared the food (in god knows what manner), often these services are used to deliver fast food.

And, the relationship between restaurant and customer is broken - so I suspect even less quality in the kitchen.

is that you actually end up eating less because it's real food you get the nutrition from, but not only additives and fillers.

Cheap food leaves you hungry - "empty calories" is a thing that affects more than our weight.

This reminded me of a newish drug that is popular with diabetics or people with high blood sugar. These drugs have effects similar to insulin and that they lower sugar levels. But one of its side effects is that it also promotes weight loss. I've heard it is safe for use, but that's why celebrities and the rich are buying most of what's available, and they are always out of stock. People will always want their cake and be able to eat it too. The rich are taking advantage of the latest technology, but for the rest of us, we will have to make do with discipline and hard work.

Yes, they talk about Ozempic-type drugs in the podcast, but I am not there yet.

I've heard it is safe for use, but that's why celebrities and the rich are buying most of what's available, and they are always out of stock.

Not sure how safe it is and once started, it is a "for life" drug apparently.

The rich are taking advantage of the latest technology, but for the rest of us, we will have to make do with discipline and hard work.

Have you ever thought which is the better life? When on the deathbed, which is valued more?

Not sure how safe it is and once started, it is a "for life" drug apparently.

Most of the ones I've read says it's very safe. It isn't even insulin, but encourages insulin production in the pancreas. People who should/usually take it are diabetics, and their insulin use is usually for life anyways so there's no difference there. What makes it even better is that it is only once a week, compared to the daily use of insulin.

Have you ever thought which is the better life? When on the deathbed, which is valued more?

Those on their deathbed will usually regret what they didn't do. If they worked too hard and neglected their family, they think they should have spent more time with them instead. If they spent too much time with the family and had a normal life, they would think they should have worked harder so they could have provided more for their family and traveled more.

Most of the ones I've read says it's very safe.

They have only been used in any form for about 10 years - won't really know about long-term effects for another 20 or so.

It isn't even insulin, but encourages insulin production in the pancreas.

Remember that the pancreas is pretty fragile and non-replaceable.

The deathbed conversation is more about whether someone is glad they put in the effort, or glad they didn't. We all die.

10 years is already long, and I think modern medicine has been really good at identifying risks and effects. They also check the person's overall health before prescribing it. If there are issues with the pancreas and other related organs then it isn't prescribed.

I think people put in the effort in all sorts of things. If you're asking about effort into exercising and discipline versus using ozempic to do more things they love, I think they will be glad that they took ozempic and got to enjoy their life more.

10 years isn't very long for these kinds of medicines at all

In recent years, peope prefer ready foods rather than cooking healthy one at home. Also, this is on-trend due to the food delivery companies, which have been popular after pandemic.

Accessibility 24/7 of everything - whether we need it or not, we can get it.

A lot of people want to try to lose weight but they have gotten used to the things they eat and trying to switch to other foods may be kinda hard
Also, some people don’t have access to foods that can make them lose weight
Some don’t even have the money so they mostly eat what is quick available to them

"Quick" is often the issue. In general, eating healthy is cheaper, if it is going to be mostly vegetables and a little meat, but it takes time to prepare and doesn't taste as good as ready.