The way we see it is the following.
A person can't be a doctor and get his/her license before taking the Hippocratic Oath!
Among other things, the Hippocratic Oath says,

"With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage."

If they (the doctors) don't help the patient and administer their knowledge or avoid doing so for whatever reason, they are actually hurting that patient and causing damage.

Furthermore, the same Hippocratic Oath also says,

"Whatsoever house I may enter, my visit shall be for the convenience and advantage of the patient; and I will willingly refrain from doing any injury or wrong from falsehood, and (in an especial manner) from acts of an amorous nature, whatever may be the rank of those who it may be my duty to cure, whether mistress or servant, bond or free."

In other words, it's not their job or duty to judge the person due to his/her social, economic, religious, racial, or national status or even less to distinguish the victims from the criminals. They (the doctors) should provide their service equally to the king and servant, bond and free.

So, from our perspective, if they do not do so and act contrary to the oath taken, they are actually breaking the oath in its core purpose and meaning and thereby losing their doctoral title and status. As such, they should be reported to the local doctoral chamber, board of medicine, medical council, and/or the ministry with the request to revoke their licenses and to lose the so-called Certificate of good standing.

!ALIVE | !BBH | !LADY