One of my favorite things to watch online is health content. Especially the ones created by professionals who actually studied health and know what they’re talking about. On one occasion, I watched a creator break down how much sugar is contained in some popular soft drinks people casually consume. My mouth stayed open through most of the video. Seeing the actual measurements of sugar being poured out, spoon by spoon, was shocking. Somewhere in my mind, I felt a little satisfied knowing I hardly take those drinks. But that satisfaction didn’t last long, because soft drinks are only a tiny part of the bigger picture.
Sugar isn’t limited to sodas alone. It exists in a million everyday things people consume without a second thought. That realization naturally leads to a bigger question, does sugar need to be regulated the same way alcohol is?
The challenge with answering that question lies in how deeply sugar has been woven into our daily lives. We are surrounded by processed foods with high sugar content, and beyond that, there are people who naturally consume large amounts of sugar as part of their diet. In some cultures, sugar is heavily used in meals and drinks, not just as an occasional treat but as a regular ingredient. So people don’t have to go out of their way to consume sugar. It almost feels like sugar comes looking for us. Unlike alcohol, which is clearly defined as a controlled substance, sugar blends into everyday living so easily that regulating it feels complicated.
Another major difference is how the effects show up. Alcohol abuse often comes with immediate and visible consequences. With sugar, the damage is quieter and long-term. Excessive sugar intake doesn’t usually send instant warning signals. Instead, it builds slowly over time. Despite all the health warnings and awareness campaigns, only a small number of intentional people truly take the message seriously. Meanwhile, more people continue to be diagnosed with diabetes and other health conditions linked to high sugar consumption. By the time the effects become obvious, the damage has often already been done.
This is where regulation starts to make sense. With proper regulation, many snacks and treats might either not be produced at all or would at least contain lower amounts of sugar than they currently do. Companies would be less able to sneak excessive sugar into products while marketing them as seem harmless or healthy. That said, regulation alone is not a magic solution. It still comes down to individual intentionality.
We already see this with alcohol. Bottles carry warnings, age restrictions are clearly stated, and people are constantly reminded to drink responsibly. Yet alcohol is still abused daily, even by underage individuals. Regulation helps reduce harm and misinformation, but it doesn’t automatically change behavior. The same would apply to sugar. Regulation could protect consumers from being misled, but personal responsibility is still necessary to keep consumption in check.
For a long time, there have been conversations about junk food being bad for health and the importance of eating better. Unfortunately, many people don’t pay attention until health problems begin to surface. It’s often only when symptoms become serious that hospital visits happen. Ironically, some of the most visible proof of sugar’s impact comes from people doing “no sugar challenges” online. By the end of these challenges, the physical changes are obvious and admirable, quietly reinforcing how much sugar affects the body.
Since completely avoiding sugar may not be realistic, individuals still have a responsibility to take better care of their health. Eating more natural as it has always been campaigned over time. Regular sugar tests are also necessary, especially for people with a family history of sugar-related diseases. In the end, regulation can guide and protect, but awareness and intentional living are what truly make the difference.
