You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: I Am #AliveAndThriving Today! || #IAmAliveChallenge || Daily Off-Grid Jungle Journal Entry: Day #672 - Happy Hive Powerup Day, and I'm One Very Active Hiver! - GaiaYoga Gardens, Lower Puna, Far East Big Island, Hawai'i - Thursday, May 30, 2024

in We Are Alive Tribe โ€ข 2 months ago (edited)

Hive users using a Hive dapp to directly help other Hive dapps to help other Hive users sounds like a great cycle. ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ˜

Sort: ย 

!INDEED I think that you're right about that! ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’š โœจ ๐Ÿค™

I have read some comments on Hive proposal posts saying that the number of active users is more important than the number of new users. ๐Ÿค“

!PIZZA

I'd say that's true. Consistently active accounts are more important than lots of accounts which may or may not be active. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ’šโœจ๐Ÿค™

!PIZZA

However, there are a lot of talks about how the term "active Hive user" is defined. ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ˜…

!PIZZA

Well, obviously if an account follows curation trails, voting can't be used as a criterion. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ’šโœจ๐Ÿค™

!INDEED

Even if a Hive account is manually used to vote, then there should still be a standard way to measure how many votes (of particular Voting Percentages) per given period of time will qualify the account as "active" (relative to automatic curation if also used). ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿค“

!PIZZA

Posts, comments, and replies would work better as metrics than votes I'd say. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ’šโœจ๐Ÿค™

!BEER

That's !INDEED true, but content consumers on Hive (who only read and curate but seldom reply) might be seen as "not active" even if they manually vote a lot. ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ˜…


Hey @savvytester, here is a little bit of BEER from @tydynrain for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.

@savvytester! @tydynrain Totally agrees with your content! so I just sent 1 IDD to your account on behalf of @tydynrain. (16/50)

(html comment removed: )