BREAKING: Evidence of Insertion of DNA coding for Spike protein into cells, causing turbo cancer in a 31y old female, after Covid vaccination!
This is something that "never could happen" as they said.
https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130/1505
It's going to take up a few replies cause I'm sure 288 characters won't suffice. But I also want to preface this by saying: I totally support independent investigations and scrutiny of the Covid vaccines. His specific case, however, is very lacking. Here is why:
II. There was no independent investigation or extensive study of this case. Nor has there been a follow up since this 'case' was first published.
III. No sufficient patient data is available. No name, hospital, pathology report, medical record, or independent clinical verification is provided. No pre-vaccination health history, genetic predisposition, occupational or environmental factors are disclosed.
IV: Human genome contains ~3-billion bp (base pairs).
A 20 bp match inside a 3-billion bp is insignificant. You can match 20 bp between a human and a mouse, or a plant, or a bacteria.
True, the level of evidence is not that of a RCT, but not true that a specific 20bp sequence is insignificant, it´s p is less than 0,002 per genome. You really think it is a coincidence that that sequence appears after mRNA vaccination and cancer?
I'm not a biologist by any means. But from what I understand, 20bp match is very common throughout the genome. So it needs to be way bigger to demonstrate a link between vaccine and tumor. (In addition to the fact that they never sequenced the tumor).
For there to be credible evidence of matching (for genomic integration), there has to be 30 bp and above. And for there to be strong evidence of link, it has to be over 100 bp match. (ChatGPT has spoken 😌).
V: I'm not sure why, but the report also states that they sequenced DNA from the patient's blood and urine, but not the tumor itself. This is actually one of the biggest scientific problems with the claim - never demonstrated a clear connection between the vaccine and the tumor.
VI: Bladder caner causes are pretty well established, and historically, there has never been a credible link between vaccines and bladder cancer. So the only thing this case has going for it is the coincidental timing. But it's not enough to be credible reporting.
You can´t compare with a classical vax, this is mRNA in nanoparticles, made for transfecting cells, we are speaking about an active gene therapy, such a genomic integration was already decomunted in cells,
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/21/e2105968118.full.pdf
To call this coincidence is simply denying facts.
For the 31-yo case, no. Because the report was very weak, biased, and not independent.
For the study you've shared, Yes, genomic integration of a fragmented RNA was done invitro. But from what I understand, it is much less likely to occur in a living human.
Until the 20bp fragment was found in a cancer patient. But anyway, it won´t be the last incidence. Time will tell who is right. Because many cancers did occur after the modRNA-"vaccination".
I agree that time will tell... I support all peer reviewed and independently verified studies. However, there have also been peer-reviewed studies of mRNA vaccines increasing cancer-fighting chances.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f22/3dabe67d4249565fcebfe13579558a712822.pdf
Yes, those are specific ones containing e.g. antisense mRNA to cancer-causing factors, but not toxic proteins.
