Well, yes, that didn't help, but also using the term 'burn' in two seemingly contradictory ways was what caused the brain cells to start spinning...lol! š š š āØ š¤
!PIZZA
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Ā Trending
Maybe the statement that says that "!LOLZ command not successful is LOLZ token burned" was the most confusing part. š¤š
!LOLZ !HUG
Exactly, that's the phrase that did it! š š š āØ š¤
!LOLZ
!HUG
I think that we should consider a token burned only if it is sent to the @null account. š¤š¤
!LUV
Yep, exactly! That's the definition that I use. š š š āØ š¤
!LUV
Looks like basically all of the confusion on my older comment is when I said "burning tokens" where the tokens are not sent to null. š¤š
!PIZZA !LUV
Your assessment is correct! You got it! š š š āØ š¤
LUV
PIZZA
Do you mean "your" instead of you're? š¤šš¤
Anyway, maybe the LOLZ burner bot needs a change of name because of the definition of token burning! š
!LUV
!PIZZA
Hehe...yes, that was a typo. It's been corrected.
That might be helpful, though a new bot would have to be created, since names can't be changed. šššāØš¤
!LUV
!PIZZA
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @tydynrain.
(2/3)
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @savvytester.
(2/3)